Every other module reads a number off the venue and applies a rule. This one asks gpt-5.6-luna what a question actually resolves at, without showing it the price, and bets only when the answer and the market disagree by 20% or more. Most of the time they agree, and agreement is not a trade — so most of this page is opinions the module formed and did not act on.
Every market the model priced, with the argument it gave — including the ones it argued itself out of. A multi-choice market is priced one answer at a time and each answer is its own row, named after the question. On this module the reasoning is the strategy, so a decline without it is the one decline nobody can check.
| market | price | model | gap | outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old School Runescape Summit/Roadmap Props :: October 2026 release for Raids 4 confirmed | 0.70 | 0.08 | -0.62 | bet 43 |
| Historical base rate is 0/3 prior OSRS raids released in October; official roadmap says The Fractured Archive is targeted for late 2026/winter, making an October confirmation unlikely despite RuneFest’s scheduled OSRS keynote on October 3–4 and the subjective resolution wording. | ||||
| UK Autumn Budget 2026: will a new first-time buyer ISA replace the Lifetime ISA? | 0.35 | 0.90 | +0.55 | bet 49 |
| Base rate: 2/2 recent UK first-time-buyer ISA launches followed through after Budget announcement; the rules exclude consultation alone, but HMT’s consultation explicitly says the new product will replace the Lifetime ISA, the scheduled Budget is 28 October 2026, and the exact resolver is that day’s HMT Budget documents, with no matching market witness found: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/first-time-buyer-isa-consultation | ||||
| Will Talarico underperform 2024 Kamala in any county? | 0.45 | 0.99 | +0.54 | bet 71 |
| Base rate is effectively 100% (3/3 analogous recent Texas statewide Democratic races had at least one county below Harris’s 2024 share); Travis, Dallas, Harris, or El Paso should remain difficult to exceed, with the exact resolver being the Wikipedia county-results table after the November 3 election (early voting October 19–30). | ||||
| On what day will the New York Times (NYT) project the winner of the House for the 2026 Midterms? :: November 4th or earl | 0.08 | 0.58 | +0.50 | bet 69 |
| Base rate is about 50% (2 of the last 4 comparable cycles were projectable by the next day); with no resolution rules, the Nov. 3, 2026 election is the key scheduled event and current forecasts favor a potentially decisive Democratic House win, but ambiguity over whether NYT's needle counts as a projection pulls this toward 0.5. | ||||
| Will there be a Scorigami in week 3 of the 2025-26 NFL season? | 0.50 | 0.00 | -0.50 | bet 73 |
| Base rate is about 6.9 Scorigamis per 285-game season (2.4% per game; roughly 32% for a 16-game week), but the rules are unambiguous and Week 3’s completed scores are all non-Scorigamis per [nflscorigami.com](https://nflscorigami.com/) and the [official NFL schedule](https://www.nfl.com/schedules/2025/by-week/week-3); the historical log shows 2025 Scorigamis in Weeks 1 and 4 onward, with no remaining calendar event able to change this [record](https://mockslate.com/scorigami/nfl/2025). | ||||
| Abdul El Sayed vote percent in Oakland County? :: At least 54% | 0.50 | 1.00 | +0.50 | bet 18 |
| Base rate: post-election revisions of 8.7 percentage points are approximately 0.1%; rules are slightly ambiguous about the Wikipedia resolver but not enough to matter; Oakland’s reported result was El-Sayed 45.3% versus Stevens 51.8%【https://michiganadvance.com/2026/08/05/michigans-democratic-senate-primary-too-close-to-call/】; no scheduled event before the October 20 close should materially change it; the exact resolver is Oakland County’s official election-results page【https://elections.oaklandcountymi.gov/government/clerk-register-of-deeds/elections-voting】, while the related county-winner market has different rules and is only a weak confirming witness【https://www.coinrithm.com/en/prediction-markets/kalshi/kxprimarycounty-senatemid26】. | ||||
| Abdul El Sayed vote percent in Oakland County? :: At least 58% | 0.50 | 0.00 | -0.50 | bet 18 |
| El-Sayed’s Oakland County share was about 45.2%, making the 58% threshold effectively impossible absent a major reporting correction. | ||||
| Abdul El Sayed vote percent in Oakland County? :: At least 64% | 0.50 | 0.01 | -0.49 | bet 18 |
| Historical base rate is 0 of the last 2 Oakland County U.S. Senate contests above 64% (54.78% in 2020 and 54.85% in 2024); the rule points to the linked Wikipedia county result, with the certified Oakland County canvass as the resolver, and the Oct. 8 debate is the only scheduled pre-close event likely to matter, while current toss-up conditions and El-Sayed's progressive profile make 64% exceptionally unlikely. | ||||
| UK Autumn Budget 2026: will mayors get a new tax power or a share of a national tax? | 0.45 | 0.93 | +0.48 | bet 57 |
| The government has already committed to assigning mayors a share of income-tax receipts beginning in 2028, and the official parliamentary answer plus Treasury’s stated Budget roadmap make Budget-day confirmation highly likely, with residual risk that the documents remain too vague under the resolution rules. | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Tappara | 0.50 | 0.02 | -0.48 | bet 69 |
| Base rate is 3/17 = 17.6% for a randomly selected team; the rules imply the bottom three of Liiga’s 17-team 2026–27 season, but Tappara was a 28.3% preseason title favorite and remains a strong roster despite a 2–2 start, so I estimate 2%, with the regular season and relegation series before the 2027-03-31 close resolved by the official Liiga standings and schedule. | ||||
| 5 Millennium Prize problems solved by the end of 2026? | 0.50 | 0.03 | -0.48 | bet 100 |
| Even granting the reported Navier–Stokes proof, reaching five total requires three more broadly credible solutions by December 31, far beyond the historical rate and unsupported by authoritative evidence. | ||||
| Abdul El Sayed vote percent in Oakland County? :: At least 62% | 0.50 | 0.03 | -0.47 | bet 17 |
| Base rate: recent Oakland County Democratic Senate shares were about 54.9% (Slotkin, 2024) and roughly 55% historically; the rules point to certified popular-vote results, with Wikipedia's 2026 Michigan Senate county table as resolver, and the Oct. 8 debate is the only scheduled pre-close event, so 62% requires an unlikely major Democratic overperformance. | ||||
| Will Trump, any of his cabinet, or any official government account mention aella by name in a tweet by January 1 2028? | 0.50 | 0.03 | -0.47 | bet 100 |
| Base rate: 0 confirmed Trump/cabinet/official-government mentions of Aella found in available indexed history; with no resolution rules, ambiguity over what counts as an official “tweet” pulls modestly toward 0.5, but the niche subject and lack of narrative catalyst keep probability low, despite 2026 midterms and routine 2027 White House events, with resolution by the relevant official X/Twitter account archive (proxy evidence: [Aella profile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aella_%28writer%29), [archived Trump social media](https://www.trumplibrary.gov/research/archived-social-media)). | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Ilves | 0.50 | 0.03 | -0.47 | bet 67 |
| Base rate is 3/17=17.6% structurally, but Ilves finished 2nd, 4th and 5th recently and is currently 6th after three games; under the rules relegation means regular-season places 15–17, with the March 23, 2027 finale before close, resolved by the official Liiga standings, so I estimate 3%. | ||||
| Will Bitcoin outperform the S&P500 any year over the next ten years? | 0.50 | 0.97 | +0.47 | bet 67 |
| Base rate: BTC beat the S&P 500 Total Return Index in roughly 8 of 12 recent complete calendar years (~67%); Yahoo Finance BTC-USD and ^SP500TR are the exact resolvers, the 2026–2036 wording conflicts with “ten years” but either interpretation leaves many opportunities, expected 2028/2032 halvings are favorable volatility catalysts, and no comparable witness market was verified. | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: JYP | 0.50 | 0.04 | -0.46 | bet 64 |
| Base rate is 3/17 = 17.6% for a random team, but JYP has 0 relegations in roughly 50 Liiga seasons; the rules relegate the three lowest regular-season finishers, JYP was sixth in 2025–26 and started 2026–27 2–0, the season ends March 23 before the March 31 close, and the official Liiga standings are the resolver, so I estimate 4%. | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Kärpät | 0.50 | 0.06 | -0.44 | bet 61 |
| Kärpät’s simulated bottom-three probability is 5.6%, well below the 17.6% mechanical prior, with clear rules and the official Liiga regular-season standings as resolver. | ||||
| 🐻 Who will be the CHUBBIEST CHONKER of Fat Bear Week 2026? 🐻 :: 610 | 0.06 | 0.50 | +0.44 | answer cap |
| 🐻 Who will be the CHUBBIEST CHONKER of Fat Bear Week 2026? 🐻 :: 132 | 0.06 | 0.50 | +0.44 | bet 79 |
| Base rate is 1/16 (6.25%) for any specified 2026 entrant, but no bear is named; the official NPS/Explore.org tournament crowns a champion Sept. 29 before the Oct. 6 close, so the malformed yes/no wording and unresolved candidate identity warrant a 0.5 estimate. | ||||
| 🐻 Who will be the CHUBBIEST CHONKER of Fat Bear Week 2026? 🐻 :: 806 | 0.06 | 0.50 | +0.44 | bet 79 |
| Base rate is 12/12 annual contests producing a champion, but the prompt names no specific bear or YES proposition; the rules are therefore materially ambiguous, so I use 0.5, with the official resolver being FatBearWeek.org/NPS and the championship scheduled for September 29, before the October 6 close. | ||||
| 🐻 Who will be the CHUBBIEST CHONKER of Fat Bear Week 2026? 🐻 :: 901 | 0.06 | 0.50 | +0.44 | bet 79 |
| Base rate is one champion per annual event (12 editions since 2014); rules name no candidate or YES condition, the champion is scheduled for September 29, 2026, and the exact resolver is the official NPS/Fat Bear Week announcement, so the malformed binary market warrants 0.50 despite incumbent Chunk’s narrative and no matching witness market. | ||||
| 🐻 Who will be the CHUBBIEST CHONKER of Fat Bear Week 2026? 🐻 :: 620 | 0.06 | 0.50 | +0.44 | bet 79 |
| Base rate: all 12 prior contests produced an official champion, but this is not a well-defined YES/NO proposition because no bear is named; the 16-bear tournament runs Sept. 22–29, with resolution by Katmai NPS/Explore.org’s official champion announcement, so ambiguity dominates. | ||||
| Best Picture nominees? (2027 Oscars) :: Behemoth | 0.50 | 0.06 | -0.44 | bet 100 |
| The raw base rate is 10 of 317 eligible films (3.2%), and Behemoth! is a major Searchlight release eligible under the rules, but it is currently just outside most top-10 forecasts; its October 2 NYFF premiere is the key pre-close event, while the exact resolver is the Academy’s January 21 announcement, with Kalshi’s roughly 2% price as a rule-matched but noisy proxy ([Academy rules](https://press.oscars.org/news/awards-rules-and-campaign-promotional-regulations-approved-99th-oscarsr), [NYFF listing](https://www.filmlinc.org/nyff2026/films/behemoth/), [market odds](https://www.covers.com/entertainment/oscars-prediction-markets-best-picture)). | ||||
| Best Picture nominees? (2027 Oscars) :: You Can See Everything | 0.50 | 0.08 | -0.42 | bet 100 |
| Its exceptional early buzz creates a real long-shot path, but the documentary’s 0-for-98 Best Picture base rate, weak expert consensus, and uncertain campaign/eligibility execution make nomination unlikely. | ||||
| Best Picture nominees? (2027 Oscars) :: Michael | 0.50 | 0.08 | -0.42 | bet 100 |
| Michael is outside the predicted top ten across current Best Picture forecasts, and its weak reviews and controversy make a late nomination unlikely despite strong box office. | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Ässät | 0.50 | 0.08 | -0.42 | answer cap |
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Lukko | 0.50 | 0.09 | -0.41 | answer cap |
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Sport | 0.50 | 0.09 | -0.41 | answer cap |
| Who will win the 2026 League of Legends World Championship? :: T1 | 0.06 | 0.45 | +0.39 | bet 71 |
| Base rate is 1/19 = 5.3% per team, while T1’s historical Worlds rate is 6/15 = 40%; the rules are unambiguous, T1 is qualified as LCK’s third seed, Worlds runs Oct 15–Nov 14 with the official Riot Worlds standings page as resolver, and the matching Polymarket witness is about 47%, so I discount hype modestly to 45%. | ||||
| Japan vs India T20 cricket match | 0.11 | 0.50 | +0.39 | bet 14 |
| The rules specify a percentage outcome but no YES threshold, so despite Japan’s low matchup win probability, the resolution ambiguity warrants a near-0.5 estimate. | ||||
| Which ticket will win the 2026 FIDE presidential election? :: Timur Turlov / Viswanathan Anand | 0.25 | 0.64 | +0.39 | bet 9 |
| Base rate is 2/2 recent FIDE elections favoring the incumbent/continuity ticket; three valid tickets are listed, Turlov–Anand has institutional continuity and Anand’s support, the scheduled resolver is the FIDE General Assembly on 26 September, and the official result will be FIDE’s announcement, with little reason to price cancellation/NOTA materially above 1% ([FIDE](https://www.fide.com/three-presidential-tickets-submitted-to-fide-office-ahead-of-2026-elections), [FIDE elections](https://www.fide.com/elections/)). | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: KalPa | 0.50 | 0.11 | -0.39 | answer cap |
| Best Picture nominees? (2027 Oscars) :: Possible Love | 0.50 | 0.12 | -0.38 | bet 100 |
| Possible Love is an unusually strong international contender with major festival momentum and Netflix backing, but the crowded ten-film field, limited English-language crossover, and rule/timing ambiguity keep its nomination probability near 12%. | ||||
| Will @manifoldpolitics create 5 or more markets in October 2026 | 0.50 | 0.12 | -0.38 | bet 49 |
| Despite a 67% historical active-month base rate, the account has been dormant for 22 months, making October reactivation with five or more creations unlikely even with the pre-midterm incentive. | ||||
| which teams will qual for nationals from GA this year :: gsmst hs | 0.50 | 0.12 | -0.38 | bet 12 |
| Base rate is roughly 4 national qualifications in about 15 recent seasons (~27%), but GSMST has recently been outside Georgia’s top tier; the 2027 rules are ambiguous because Georgia is splitting Division C into tiers, with registration by Oct. 31, regionals Feb. 6–27, state tournaments in Mar.–Apr., and the official resolver being GASO’s Division C state results, so I discount the historical peak and assign 12%. | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Pelicans | 0.50 | 0.12 | -0.38 | answer cap |
| US Average Gas Price Is $4.4500 or more on September 24 2026? | 0.48 | 0.86 | +0.38 | bet 100 |
| AAA’s strong recent upward trend leaves a substantial cushion above $4.4500, so barring a sharp crude or refinery reversal the September 24 average is likely to remain at or above the threshold. | ||||
| Old School Runescape Summit/Roadmap Props :: Announced continuation to Sea Slug questline planned for 202 | 0.20 | 0.58 | +0.38 | bet 17 |
| Base rate: roughly 1–2 named OSRS questline continuations are announced per year, while Sea Slug has had none for about 17 years; the rules make the exact meaning of “planned” somewhat ambiguous, but the game-jam proposal and sea-focused roadmap raise the estimate above base rate; the key scheduled event is RuneFest OSRS Summit on October 3–4, with resolution by Jagex’s official RuneFest/OSRS roadmap announcement. | ||||
| Abdul El Sayed vote percent in Oakland County? :: At least 60% | 0.50 | 0.13 | -0.37 | answer cap |
| Best Picture nominees? (2027 Oscars) :: Dune: Part Three | 0.61 | 0.24 | -0.37 | answer cap |
| Best Picture nominees? (2027 Oscars) :: The Invite | 0.50 | 0.14 | -0.36 | answer cap |
| Will Mistral AI and/or its investors sue Juan Branco for Defamation in 2026 | 0.50 | 0.14 | -0.36 | bet 46 |
| A qualifying filing is legally straightforward but historically uncommon, and although Branco’s attacks and Cédric O’s litigation history provide a modest boost, there is no reported filing or scheduled trigger with only about three months remaining. | ||||
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: HIFK | 0.50 | 0.14 | -0.36 | answer cap |
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: HPK | 0.50 | 0.14 | -0.36 | answer cap |
| Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: KooKoo | 0.50 | 0.14 | -0.36 | answer cap |
| who will win HSBT? :: Outstanding Orangutangs | 0.14 | 0.50 | +0.36 | answer cap |
| who will win HSBT? :: MSJ A | 0.14 | 0.50 | +0.36 | bet 57 |
| Base rate is unknowable without the field size, and with no resolution rules, identifiable event, calendar, or exact resolver, ambiguity dominates and pulls the estimate to 0.5. | ||||
| who will win HSBT? :: MSJ B | 0.14 | 0.50 | +0.36 | bet 57 |
| Base rate: unknown because the field size and historical results are unavailable; rules and resolver are unspecified, “HSBT”/“MSJ B” are ambiguous, and no scheduled event or matching witness can be verified, so the estimate is pulled to 0.50. | ||||
| who will win HSBT? :: NOHO A | 0.14 | 0.50 | +0.36 | bet 57 |
| HSBT and NOHO A are undefined under the supplied rules, so the outcome and resolver cannot be identified and the estimate defaults to 50%. | ||||
| who will win HSBT? :: BRIDGELAND | 0.14 | 0.50 | +0.36 | bet 57 |
| No defensible entrant-specific base rate or exact resolver exists: the rules are blank, HSBT’s official page provides no Bridgeland linkage, and Bridgeland’s next listed game is after close, so I use a 50% ambiguity prior. | ||||
| utc | version | market | bet | result | why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-22 16:49 | v89-twin | On what day will the New York Times (NYT) project the winner of the House for the 2026 Midterms? :: November 7 | YES 19 | open +7 | model 0.27; edge +0.16; luna-medium price-blind says 0.27 vs answer 0.11 (edge +0.16 >= 0.1): Base rate is 1/3 across the last three midterms (House control clear by Nov. 7 in 2018, Nov. 16 in 2022, and Nov. 13 in 2024); the scheduled event is the Nov. 3, 2026 general election ([FEC](https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/election-results-and-voting-information/)), and the resolver would be NYT’s official 2026 election-results projection, but absent resolution rules create ambiguity over what counts as a projection, so I modestly pull toward 0.5 while discounting the historical proxy. |
| 09-22 16:49 | v89-twin | On what day will the New York Times (NYT) project the winner of the House for the 2026 Midterms? :: November 6 | YES 20 | open -4 | model 0.25; edge +0.14; luna-medium price-blind says 0.25 vs answer 0.11 (edge +0.14 >= 0.1): Base rate: roughly 1 of 4 recent elections produced a House-control projection by the third day after Election Day; rules are unspecified, creating ambiguity over what counts as an NYT projection; November 3, 2026 is Election Day and November 6 has no scheduled decisive event; the resolver would be NYT’s election-results page, with no matching witness market verified. |
| 09-22 16:49 | v89-twin | On what day will the New York Times (NYT) project the winner of the House for the 2026 Midterms? :: November 4 | YES 66 | open +20 | model 0.58; edge +0.50; luna-medium price-blind says 0.58 vs answer 0.08 (edge +0.50 >= 0.1): Base rate is about 50% (2 of the last 4 comparable cycles were projectable by the next day); with no resolution rules, the Nov. 3, 2026 election is the key scheduled event and current forecasts favor a potentially decisive Democratic House win, but ambiguity over whether NYT's needle counts as a projection pulls this toward 0.5. |
| 09-22 16:49 | v89-twin | On what day will the New York Times (NYT) project the winner of the House for the 2026 Midterms? :: November 1 | YES 42 | open +18 | model 0.42; edge +0.31; luna-medium price-blind says 0.42 vs answer 0.11 (edge +0.31 >= 0.1): Base rate is 1/4 recent midterms (25%) with House control projected on or after Nov. 13; the 2026 election is Nov. 3, current forecasts suggest a competitive Democratic-favored House, and the absent resolution rules create ambiguity over whether NYT means its live results page or any NYT projection, so I adjust upward but toward 0.5; resolver would be NYT’s official 2026 House results/projection page, with Cook and other forecasts only proxies. |
| 09-22 16:46 | v89-twin | Old School Runescape Summit/Roadmap Props :: October 2026 release for Raids 4 confirmed | NO 43 | open +14 | model 0.08; edge -0.62; luna-medium price-blind says 0.08 vs answer 0.70 (edge -0.62 >= 0.3): Historical base rate is 0/3 prior OSRS raids released in October; official roadmap says The Fractured Archive is targeted for late 2026/winter, making an October confirmation unlikely despite RuneFest’s scheduled OSRS keynote on October 3–4 and the subjective resolution wording. |
| 09-22 16:46 | v89-twin | Old School Runescape Summit/Roadmap Props :: Announced continuation to Sea Slug questline planned for 2027 | YES 16 | open -0 | model 0.58; edge +0.38; luna-medium price-blind says 0.58 vs answer 0.20 (edge +0.38 >= 0.3): Base rate: roughly 1–2 named OSRS questline continuations are announced per year, while Sea Slug has had none for about 17 years; the rules make the exact meaning of “planned” somewhat ambiguous, but the game-jam proposal and sea-focused roadmap raise the estimate above base rate; the key scheduled event is RuneFest OSRS Summit on October 3–4, with resolution by Jagex’s official RuneFest/OSRS roadmap announcement. |
| 09-22 15:05 | v89-twin | Will the term Super Intelligents replace Artificial intelligence before EOY | NO 0 | unfilled | model 0.12; edge -0.31; luna-medium price-blind says 0.12 vs market 0.43 (edge -0.31 >= 0.2): The literal term has negligible current usage and no exact resolver is specified, so despite ambiguity lifting the estimate above the ~0.5% terminology-replacement base rate, YES remains unlikely. |
| 09-22 14:45 | v89-twin | UK Autumn Budget 2026: will a £2 bus fare cap be funded beyond the end of 2027? | YES 20 | open +7 | model 0.58; edge +0.33; luna-medium price-blind says 0.58 vs market 0.25 (edge +0.33 >= 0.2): A 50% historical renewal base rate is nudged upward by the government's current cost-of-living and £2-cap commitment, but fiscal pressure and the explicit one-year funding horizon keep YES below high confidence. |
| 09-22 14:43 | v89-twin | UK Autumn Budget 2026: will the Energy Profits Levy be raised or extended? | YES 17 | open +9 | model 0.58; edge +0.23; luna-medium price-blind says 0.58 vs market 0.35 (edge +0.23 >= 0.2): Base rate is about 75% (3 of the last 4 UK Budgets introduced, raised, extended, or replaced an oil-and-gas windfall tax); rules make the key ambiguity whether HMT confirms the already-announced Oil and Gas Revenue Levy, sentiment is secondary, the scheduled event is the 28 October 2026 Budget, and the resolver is HMT’s Budget-day documents and speech, with no matching witness market found ([HMT levy policy](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/oil-and-gas-taxation-oil-and-gas-revenue-levy), [Budget date](https://www.gov.uk/government/news/budget-to-move-power-and-money-out-of-westminster-and-into-every-postcode-around-britain)). |
| 09-22 14:42 | v89-twin | UK Autumn Budget 2026: will a new first-time buyer ISA replace the Lifetime ISA? | YES 49 | open +16 | model 0.90; edge +0.55; luna-medium price-blind says 0.90 vs market 0.35 (edge +0.55 >= 0.2): Base rate: 2/2 recent UK first-time-buyer ISA launches followed through after Budget announcement; the rules exclude consultation alone, but HMT’s consultation explicitly says the new product will replace the Lifetime ISA, the scheduled Budget is 28 October 2026, and the exact resolver is that day’s HMT Budget documents, with no matching market witness found: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/first-time-buyer-isa-consultation |
| 09-22 14:34 | v89-twin | UK Autumn Budget 2026: will the 'mansion tax' threshold be set below £2 million? | YES 15 | open -0 | model 0.55; edge +0.20; luna-medium price-blind says 0.55 vs market 0.35 (edge +0.20 >= 0.2): Base rate is 0 of 1 comparable prior Budget announcements lowering this newly introduced threshold; the 18 September report of a live £1.5m discussion raises it, but political and implementation risks keep it near even odds, with the decisive resolver being HM Treasury’s Budget speech/documents on 28 October 2026 and consultations alone counting NO. |
| 09-22 14:33 | v89-twin | UK Autumn Budget 2026: will it freeze fuel duty or cancel a scheduled rise? | YES 41 | open -0 | model 0.88; edge +0.24; luna-medium price-blind says 0.88 vs market 0.64 (edge +0.24 >= 0.2): The base rate is unusually favorable and HM Treasury has already announced no fuel-duty rise in 2026, making Budget-document confirmation of a negative 2027-28 impact likely despite the non-equivalent Polymarket witness. |
| 09-22 13:52 | v89-twin | Who will win the 2026 League of Legends World Championship? :: Hanwha Life Esports | YES 25 | open +6 | model 0.18; edge +0.12; luna-medium price-blind says 0.18 vs answer 0.06 (edge +0.12 >= 0.1): Base rate is 1/19 = 5.3% for an equal-field team; rules clearly mean the tournament winner, HLE won MSI but lost the LCK final 1-3 to Gen.G, the only material scheduled event is Worlds (Oct 15–Nov 14), Riot’s LoL Esports standings page is the resolver, and the matching outright Polymarket witness was 18.5% (thin liquidity), so I estimate 18%. |
| 09-22 13:52 | v89-twin | Who will win the 2026 League of Legends World Championship? :: Gen. G | YES 63 | open +18 | model 0.40; edge +0.34; luna-medium price-blind says 0.40 vs answer 0.06 (edge +0.34 >= 0.1): Base rate is 5.3% for a uniform 19-team field and LCK teams won 9 of the last 13 Worlds (69%); rules are clear, Gen.G is qualified as LCK champion, hype is secondary to its strong form, Worlds runs Oct. 15–Nov. 14 with the Nov. 14 final before the Nov. 30 close, Riot’s LoL Esports site is the resolver, and the matching Polymarket market prices Gen.G near 41% (low-volume proxy), so I shade slightly below that to 40%. |
| 09-22 13:52 | v89-twin | Who will win the 2026 League of Legends World Championship? :: G2 Esports | YES 32 | open +6 | model 0.22; edge +0.16; luna-medium price-blind says 0.22 vs answer 0.06 (edge +0.16 >= 0.1): Base rate: LEC teams have won 1 of 15 completed Worlds (6.7%) and G2 has won 0 of 15; G2 is nevertheless Riot’s current #4 team, has qualified as LEC’s top seed, and a comparable winner market prices it at 23%, so I estimate 22% ahead of the Oct 15–Nov 14 tournament, resolved by Riot’s official LoL Esports winner announcement ([Riot schedule](https://lolesports.com/en-US/news/msi-and-worlds-updates), [Riot rankings](https://lolesports.com/es-MX/gpr/2026/current), [comparable market](https://www.paridesk.com/markets/worlds-2026-winner)). |
| 09-22 13:52 | v89-twin | Who will win the 2026 League of Legends World Championship? :: T1 | YES 69 | open +38 | model 0.45; edge +0.39; luna-medium price-blind says 0.45 vs answer 0.06 (edge +0.39 >= 0.1): Base rate is 1/19 = 5.3% per team, while T1’s historical Worlds rate is 6/15 = 40%; the rules are unambiguous, T1 is qualified as LCK’s third seed, Worlds runs Oct 15–Nov 14 with the official Riot Worlds standings page as resolver, and the matching Polymarket witness is about 47%, so I discount hype modestly to 45%. |
| 09-21 09:54 | v89-twin | Japan vs India T20 cricket match | YES 14 | settled +27 | model 0.50; edge +0.39; luna-medium price-blind says 0.50 vs market 0.11 (edge +0.39 >= 0.2): The rules specify a percentage outcome but no YES threshold, so despite Japan’s low matchup win probability, the resolution ambiguity warrants a near-0.5 estimate. |
| 09-21 09:41 | v89-twin | Will either Trump or Xi explicitly mention Taiwan during the upcoming Trump-Xi summit? :: Yes, Taiwan will be | YES 0 | unfilled | model 0.74; edge +0.24; luna-medium price-blind says 0.74 vs answer 0.50 (edge +0.24 >= 0.1): Base rate is 1/2 (50%) across the two most recent Trump-Xi summits, but the Sept. 24 meeting is officially confirmed [by China’s MFA](https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202609/t20260921_12027514.html), Taiwan is a central expected agenda item [per Reuters](https://uk.marketscreener.com/news/xi-rolls-into-trump-summit-with-china-s-trade-engine-roaring-ce785adbd98af123), and the exact resolver—White House/FMPRC proceedings or a substantive press response—makes an explicit mention more likely than the prior 50%, with dodged questions excluded. |
| 09-21 09:41 | v89-twin | Will either Trump or Xi explicitly mention Taiwan during the upcoming Trump-Xi summit? :: No, Taiwan will not | NO 46 | open +9 | model 0.18; edge -0.32; luna-medium price-blind says 0.18 vs answer 0.50 (edge -0.32 >= 0.1): Base rate: Taiwan was explicitly mentioned in 1 of the 2 most recent Trump-Xi summits (50%); the Sept. 24 summit is officially scheduled during Xi’s Sept. 23–25 state visit, and Xi’s May summit readout made Taiwan central, so the Chinese MFA communiqué makes a no-mention outcome unlikely ([MFA schedule](https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202609/t20260921_12027514.html), [May readout](https://www.gov.cn/news/202605/14/content_WS6a055086c6d00ca5f9a0af1a.html)). |
| 09-21 08:50 | v89-twin | US Average Gas Price Is $4.3500 or more on September 28 2026? | YES 100 | open +68 | model 0.78; edge +0.23; luna-medium price-blind says 0.78 vs market 0.55 (edge +0.23 >= 0.2): AAA’s $4.4786 current average is 12.86¢ above the threshold, and recent gasoline/RBOB momentum outweighs the usual late-September seasonal decline, though the September 23 EIA report adds material downside volatility. |
| 09-21 08:49 | v89-twin | US Average Gas Price Is $4.4500 or more on September 24 2026? | YES 100 | open +61 | model 0.86; edge +0.38; luna-medium price-blind says 0.86 vs market 0.48 (edge +0.38 >= 0.2): AAA’s strong recent upward trend leaves a substantial cushion above $4.4500, so barring a sharp crude or refinery reversal the September 24 average is likely to remain at or above the threshold. |
| 09-21 08:36 | v89-twin | Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: JYP | NO 0 | unfilled | model 0.04; edge -0.46; luna-medium price-blind says 0.04 vs answer 0.50 (edge -0.46 >= 0.3): Base rate is 3/17 = 17.6% for a random team, but JYP has 0 relegations in roughly 50 Liiga seasons; the rules relegate the three lowest regular-season finishers, JYP was sixth in 2025–26 and started 2026–27 2–0, the season ends March 23 before the March 31 close, and the official Liiga standings are the resolver, so I estimate 4%. |
| 09-21 08:36 | v89-twin | Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Kärpät | NO 51 | open +7 | model 0.06; edge -0.44; luna-medium price-blind says 0.06 vs answer 0.50 (edge -0.44 >= 0.3): Kärpät’s simulated bottom-three probability is 5.6%, well below the 17.6% mechanical prior, with clear rules and the official Liiga regular-season standings as resolver. |
| 09-21 08:36 | v89-twin | Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Tappara | NO 0 | unfilled | model 0.02; edge -0.48; luna-medium price-blind says 0.02 vs answer 0.50 (edge -0.48 >= 0.3): Base rate is 3/17 = 17.6% for a randomly selected team; the rules imply the bottom three of Liiga’s 17-team 2026–27 season, but Tappara was a 28.3% preseason title favorite and remains a strong roster despite a 2–2 start, so I estimate 2%, with the regular season and relegation series before the 2027-03-31 close resolved by the official Liiga standings and schedule. |
| 09-21 08:36 | v89-twin | Which three teams are relegated from Finnish Hockey League in 2027? :: Ilves | NO 0 | unfilled | model 0.03; edge -0.47; luna-medium price-blind says 0.03 vs answer 0.50 (edge -0.47 >= 0.3): Base rate is 3/17=17.6% structurally, but Ilves finished 2nd, 4th and 5th recently and is currently 6th after three games; under the rules relegation means regular-season places 15–17, with the March 23, 2027 finale before close, resolved by the official Liiga standings, so I estimate 3%. |
| 09-21 07:06 | v89-twin | Will the Magic the Gathering movie make over 350 million at the global box office? | NO 39 | open +11 | model 0.18; edge -0.32; luna-medium price-blind says 0.18 vs market 0.50 (edge -0.32 >= 0.2): Base rate is roughly 20% for a new fantasy/game-IP theatrical film to exceed $350M worldwide; Hasbro/Legendary have writers and Matt Johnson attached but no release date, so I estimate ~55% wide-release-by-2030 × ~33% conditional success, with NYCC 2026 a possible but non-mechanical update; the resolver is the film’s [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic%3A_The_Gathering) worldwide-gross figure, and no matching witness market is available. |
| 09-21 04:52 | v89-twin | which teams will qual for nationals from GA this year :: gsmst hs | NO 2 | open +1 | model 0.12; edge -0.38; luna-medium price-blind says 0.12 vs answer 0.50 (edge -0.38 >= 0.3): Base rate is roughly 4 national qualifications in about 15 recent seasons (~27%), but GSMST has recently been outside Georgia’s top tier; the 2027 rules are ambiguous because Georgia is splitting Division C into tiers, with registration by Oct. 31, regionals Feb. 6–27, state tournaments in Mar.–Apr., and the official resolver being GASO’s Division C state results, so I discount the historical peak and assign 12%. |
| 09-21 02:25 | v89-twin | Will Trump, any of his cabinet, or any official government account mention aella by name in a tweet by January | NO 100 | open +17 | model 0.03; edge -0.47; luna-medium price-blind says 0.03 vs market 0.50 (edge -0.47 >= 0.2): Base rate: 0 confirmed Trump/cabinet/official-government mentions of Aella found in available indexed history; with no resolution rules, ambiguity over what counts as an official “tweet” pulls modestly toward 0.5, but the niche subject and lack of narrative catalyst keep probability low, despite 2026 midterms and routine 2027 White House events, with resolution by the relevant official X/Twitter account archive (proxy evidence: [Aella profile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aella_%28writer%29), [archived Trump social media](https://www.trumplibrary.gov/research/archived-social-media)). |
| 09-21 02:17 | v89-twin | Will the United States become a dictatorship by 2400? | YES 17 | open +18 | model 0.53; edge +0.33; luna-medium price-blind says 0.53 vs market 0.20 (edge +0.33 >= 0.2): Historical base rate is about 1.2% annual democratic-breakdown risk across presidential democracies, but the United States’ longevity and wealth imply a lower hazard; the strict three-year closed-autocracy rule and ambiguous 2400 dissolution clause pull toward 0.5, despite current backsliding, with the November 3, 2026 federal election as the nearest scheduled test; resolution would rely chiefly on V-Dem’s Regimes of the World and CSP Polity data, while Metaculus/Manifold’s roughly 28–31% by 2100 forecasts use materially looser rules and are only weak witnesses. |
| 09-20 23:49 | v89-twin | Will @manifoldpolitics create 5 or more markets in October 2026 | NO 49 | open +18 | model 0.12; edge -0.38; luna-medium price-blind says 0.12 vs market 0.50 (edge -0.38 >= 0.2): Despite a 67% historical active-month base rate, the account has been dormant for 22 months, making October reactivation with five or more creations unlikely even with the pre-midterm incentive. |
| 09-20 23:13 | v89-twin | Will Democrat Chris Pappas win New Hampshire Senate election by 10% or more? | NO 9 | open +0 | model 0.17; edge -0.33; luna-medium price-blind says 0.17 vs market 0.50 (edge -0.33 >= 0.2): Base rate: recent New Hampshire Senate elections cleared a 10-point margin in 2 of 6 contests (33%), but only 1 of the last 5 Democratic wins; rules imply a standard 10-point vote-margin threshold, current polls average Pappas +3.3 points with the latest at +8, and Cook rates the race Toss-Up, so sentiment does not support a large-margin forecast; the key scheduled event is the November 3 election, with the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s certified general-election results as the exact resolver (polling and Cook are proxies). |
| 09-20 23:12 | v89-twin | Who will be the next (non-interim) leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia? :: Trevor Halford | NO 100 | open +0 | model 0.02; edge -0.12; luna-medium price-blind says 0.02 vs answer 0.14 (edge -0.12 >= 0.1): Base rate is 2 permanent-leader changes in roughly 7 years (~0.29/year); despite recent turmoil, Halford was not a 2026 leadership contestant and was removed from caucus, while the Sept. 26 by-election and Oct. 17 local elections are the main scheduled catalysts, so official Conservative Party announcements (with credible-media consensus) imply a very low chance he becomes the next permanent leader. |
| 09-20 23:12 | v89-twin | Who will be the next (non-interim) leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia? :: Caroline Elliott | YES 31 | open +7 | model 0.34; edge +0.20; luna-medium price-blind says 0.34 vs answer 0.14 (edge +0.20 >= 0.1): Caroline Elliott narrowly lost the 2026 leadership race and is the strongest identifiable successor, but the party’s recent turnover rate is not enough to make a future Elliott victory more likely than not. |
| 09-20 23:12 | v89-twin | Who will be the next (non-interim) leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia? :: James Moore | NO 100 | open +4 | model 0.02; edge -0.12; luna-medium price-blind says 0.02 vs answer 0.14 (edge -0.12 >= 0.1): Base rate: 2 permanent-leader changes in roughly 7 years (~0.29/year), implying about a 30% chance of any successor by the 2028 close; James Moore declined the 2026 contest and endorsed another candidate, so I estimate roughly 5–7% conditional on a vacancy, with the Sept. 26 Abbotsford–Mission by-election as the main scheduled catalyst, while the exact resolver is the party’s official announcement (confirmed by [party results](https://conservativebc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2026-05-30-Conservative-Party-of-BC-Leadership-Results.pdf) and [official team page](https://www.conservativebc.ca/our-team/)), and no matching witness market was found. |
| 09-20 22:38 | v89-twin | Will Talarico underperform 2024 Kamala in any county? | YES 71 | open -5 | model 0.99; edge +0.54; luna-medium price-blind says 0.99 vs market 0.45 (edge +0.54 >= 0.2): Base rate is effectively 100% (3/3 analogous recent Texas statewide Democratic races had at least one county below Harris’s 2024 share); Travis, Dallas, Harris, or El Paso should remain difficult to exceed, with the exact resolver being the Wikipedia county-results table after the November 3 election (early voting October 19–30). |
| 09-20 22:29 | v89-twin | Will the 2027 presidential French elections be decided at the first round? | NO 23 | open +3 | model 0.00; edge -0.21; luna-medium price-blind says 0.00 vs market 0.21 (edge -0.21 >= 0.2): Historical base rate is 0/11 French presidential elections since 1965; the rules clearly require over 50% in round one, and the scheduled April 18, 2027 vote will be settled by the French Interior Ministry or Constitutional Council, while related runoff-qualification markets do not match this criterion. |
| 09-20 22:08 | v89-twin | Will OpenAI publicly claim a solution to a SECOND Millennium Prize Problem by November 30, 2026? | NO 49 | open -2 | model 0.10; edge -0.25; luna-medium price-blind says 0.10 vs market 0.35 (edge -0.25 >= 0.2): Base rate is 0 completed solutions among these five problems over roughly 26 years; rules are clear but 'complete solution' has modest ambiguity, OpenAI's recent Navier–Stokes claim and active math effort raise the rate above baseline, no decisive scheduled event before November 30 is identified, the resolver is an official OpenAI channel ([research page](https://openai.com/news/research/), corroborated if needed by named outlets), and no matching witness-market prices are available. |
| 09-20 21:30 | v89-twin | Will $500 Obamacare rebate checks start going out by Oct. 31 2026? (ACA) | YES 21 | open -3 | model 0.68; edge +0.23; luna-medium price-blind says 0.68 vs market 0.45 (edge +0.23 >= 0.2): The administration has publicly committed to October payments and has a strong pre-midterm incentive, but the absence of a published disbursement mechanism and uncertainty over legal authority keep the probability below 75%. |
| 09-20 21:24 | v89-twin | When will SSI announce a model? :: Q4 2027 | YES 29 | open -7 | model 0.22; edge +0.16; luna-medium price-blind says 0.22 vs answer 0.06 (edge +0.16 >= 0.1): SSI’s compute expansion makes a 2027 model announcement plausible, but its zero model announcements across three official updates, secretive mission, and the failed 2026 rumor keep the specific Q4 2027 probability low. |
| 09-20 21:24 | v89-twin | When will SSI announce a model? :: Later | YES 29 | open -14 | model 0.39; edge +0.19; luna-medium price-blind says 0.39 vs answer 0.20 (edge +0.19 >= 0.1): Base rate is 0 SSI model announcements in roughly 2.25 years; SSI’s official updates page still lists no model announcement [official updates](https://ssi.inc/updates), while the NVIDIA compute ramp over the next year is the main calendar catalyst, and a related market’s 13% 2028+ proxy is rule-mismatched and stale, so ambiguity around “Later” warrants a pull toward 0.5. |
| 09-20 21:24 | v89-twin | When will SSI announce a model? :: Q2 2027 | YES 30 | open -8 | model 0.23; edge +0.17; luna-medium price-blind says 0.23 vs answer 0.06 (edge +0.17 >= 0.1): Base rate is roughly 60% for a well-funded frontier AI lab to announce its first model within 7–9 months, but SSI’s official updates page still lists no model announcement, the August 2026 rumor missed, no SSI event is scheduled before Q2 2027, and the closest witness (Mantic’s stricter public-release forecast) points earlier, so I discount Q2; resolver is SSI’s updates page. |
| 09-20 21:24 | v89-twin | When will SSI announce a model? :: Q4 2026 | YES 0 | unfilled | model 0.34; edge +0.28; luna-medium price-blind says 0.34 vs answer 0.06 (edge +0.28 >= 0.1): Base rate: use 25% as a naive quarterly prior; SSI missed the August rumor, but its July partnership says research is ready to scale, NVIDIA Vera Rubin systems are expected in Q4, and the official resolver is SSI’s updates page, which currently has no model announcement; related release markets are not rule-matched, while “model” is underspecified, so I modestly raise the estimate to 34%.[SSI updates](https://ssi.inc/updates) [NVIDIA partnership](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/27/3333561/0/en/ilya-sutskevers-safe-superintelligence-inc-and-nvidia-announce-long-term-strategic-partnership.html) [Rubin availability](https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-vera-rubin-delivers-world-class-supercomputers-for-science) |
| 09-20 21:14 | v89-twin | Will there be a Scorigami in week 3 of the 2025-26 NFL season? | NO 0 | open +0 | model 0.00; edge -0.50; luna-medium price-blind says 0.00 vs market 0.50 (edge -0.50 >= 0.2): Base rate is about 6.9 Scorigamis per 285-game season (2.4% per game; roughly 32% for a 16-game week), but the rules are unambiguous and Week 3’s completed scores are all non-Scorigamis per [nflscorigami.com](https://nflscorigami.com/) and the [official NFL schedule](https://www.nfl.com/schedules/2025/by-week/week-3); the historical log shows 2025 Scorigamis in Weeks 1 and 4 onward, with no remaining calendar event able to change this [record](https://mockslate.com/scorigami/nfl/2025). |
| 09-20 19:52 | v89-twin | 5 Millennium Prize problems solved by the end of 2026? | NO 100 | open +63 | model 0.03; edge -0.47; luna-medium price-blind says 0.03 vs market 0.50 (edge -0.48 >= 0.2): Even granting the reported Navier–Stokes proof, reaching five total requires three more broadly credible solutions by December 31, far beyond the historical rate and unsupported by authoritative evidence. |
| 09-20 19:37 | v89-twin | Will the MAGA ‘Moderates’ all lose reelection? | NO 100 | open +5 | model 0.11; edge -0.24; luna-medium price-blind says 0.11 vs market 0.35 (edge -0.24 >= 0.2): All three races are genuinely competitive, but the historical incumbent-loss base rate and Fitzpatrick’s residual advantage make the joint all-loss outcome only about 11% likely. |
| 09-20 19:18 | v89-twin | Will Mistral AI and/or its investors sue Juan Branco for Defamation in 2026 | NO 0 | open +0 | model 0.14; edge -0.36; luna-medium price-blind says 0.14 vs market 0.50 (edge -0.36 >= 0.2): A qualifying filing is legally straightforward but historically uncommon, and although Branco’s attacks and Cédric O’s litigation history provide a modest boost, there is no reported filing or scheduled trigger with only about three months remaining. |
| 09-20 18:12 | v89-twin | Duskbloods release date? :: September | NO 82 | open +7 | model 0.06; edge -0.14; luna-medium price-blind says 0.06 vs answer 0.20 (edge -0.14 >= 0.1): Base rate: I estimate ~6% for a major unreleased game with only a year-level window to launch in the final 11 days of September; the rules are clear, sentiment/speculation is weak evidence, Tokyo Game Show runs through September 21, and the exact resolver is Nintendo’s official Duskbloods product page/FromSoftware site—both still say only 2026, with no matching witness market found. |
| 09-19 16:47 | v89-twin | Which charities will be recommended by GiveWell at the end of 2027? :: Helen Keller International | YES 9 | open +2 | model 0.82; edge +0.32; luna-medium price-blind says 0.82 vs answer 0.50 (edge +0.32 >= 0.3): Base rate is 9/9 annual GiveWell year-end lists since 2017 (100%), and HKI has a grant extending into 2027, but the undefined rules and GiveWell’s likely year-end 2027 review create uncertainty; the resolver is GiveWell’s official Top Charities page. |
48 trades, 1,837 staked, realised +27, open +920 if held / +415 if sold, 6 unfilled.
In the traces on hand the model priced 251
answers across 163 markets and the module acted on
69 of them (27%). The journal holds
48 trades for 1,837 mana. 1 of them settled for +27.
An estimate the model declines to give is treated as no opinion and never
as a cheap one.
Traces are diagnostic and rotate; the trading journal is the book above.
Built 2026-09-22 18:16Z.